09/07/2025
Back to all articles
Hiring the right candidate is no easy task. As competition intensifies and organizations prioritize fair hiring practices, the need for objective and consistent recruitment tools has never been greater.
Traditionally, interviews have been the go-to method for evaluating candidates. However, psychometric tests are gaining ground as a scientifically validated way to reduce bias and improve decision-making.
But what makes psychometric tests vs interviews a topic worth exploring? And why are psychometric tools increasingly seen as more objective and reliable?
Understanding Psychometric Tests
What are Psychometric Tests?
Psychometric tests are standardized assessments designed to measure a candidate’s:
These tests are widely used in standardized hiring assessments to predict job performance, learning agility, and leadership potential.
Purpose of Psychometric Testing in Recruitment
Example: A financial institution uses cognitive ability tests to screen for analytical thinking in junior analysts, helping to shortlist talent from a large, diverse pool.
The Subjectivity of Interviews
Why Are Interviews Prone to Bias?
While interviews remain a critical step, they are inherently subjective. Even in structured interviews, human judgment introduces variability.
Common types of bias in interviews:
Interviewer Variability
Two interviewers can assess the same candidate very differently based on tone, mood, experience, or expectations. This lack of standardization makes comparison across candidates inconsistent and harder to justify.
Research shows that unstructured interviews have a predictive validity of only 0.20, compared to 0.51 for general mental ability tests (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998).
Objectivity in Psychometric Testing
What Makes Psychometric Tests More Objective?
Psychometric tools offer greater objectivity in recruitment because they are:
Example: Two candidates taking the same personality assessment will get results benchmarked against a norm group; not against each other or the interviewer’s opinion.
Psychometric Tests vs. Interviews: a Comparative Analysis
Criteria |
Psychometric Tests |
Interviews |
Objectivity |
High - standardized scoring |
Low - subject to human bias |
Predicitive Validity |
Strong (esp. cognitive ability tests) |
Moderate (higher in structured formats) |
Consistency |
High |
Varies across interviewers |
Candidate Experience |
Can feel impersonal |
Allows for rapport-building |
Cultural Fit Assessment |
Possible through personality tools |
Easier to gauge through conversation |
Implementation |
Requires tolls/training |
Easier to deploy initially |
Neither method is perfect. But psychometric tests clearly bring more consistency and scientific rigor to the hiring process.
Integrating Both Methods for Optimal Hiring
The best talent strategies combine psychometric testing with structured interviews.
Best Practices:
Case Study: A multinational implemented both a situational judgment test and a structured behavioral interview to hire sales managers. Result? A 22% reduction in first-year turnover
Psychometric tests and interviews each have their place, but when it comes to objectivity, consistency, and predictive accuracy, psychometric assessments stand out.
They support fair hiring, reduce human bias, and improve the quality of decision-making. By blending these tools with well-designed interviews, HR teams can build a robust, evidence-based recruitment process.
Want to implement psychometric testing in your hiring process?
We help companies build fair, evidence-based recruitment strategies through our psychometric tests.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes psychometric tests more objective than interviews?
They use standardized questions, automated scoring, and are free from interviewer bias, making results comparable across all candidates.
Can interviews be made more objective?
Yes. Use structured interview formats, predefined scoring rubrics, and trained interviewers to reduce subjectivity.
Are psychometric tests reliable predictors of job performance?
Yes. Especially cognitive ability tests, which show the highest predictive validity (0.51) among selection tools.
Do psychometric tests eliminate all hiring biases?
No, but they significantly reduce bias by removing subjective judgment from initial screening stages.
How can organizations implement psychometric testing effectively?